I will say this for the third time, and no you aren't understanding the genetics. From what I can see, you have a high school understanding of it all.
The stability of all the chromosomes is more dependent on the genetic code of several genes that ARE NOT ON THE X Chromosome. These of the DNA repair genes, the onocogenes, and the apoptosis genes. These genes repair the DNA that mutates. These kill the cell if it can't be saved. These are the keepers of the genome. This is what prevent mutation and deals with mutation. As well as the fact that there is a good chance that the X you are getting is within 5 generations of a male ancestor. The genetic damage, considering the gene density, will be minor, and repairable.
What you call the pertinent parts are the parts that are plain wrong. While the mother has a higher chance of provided a mutated set of chromosomes, not all her genetic material is going to be mutated. They aren't going to be reliant on the Father's X over the mother's. This is not going to be the hot bed of mutations. It is going to be the genetic reason that the male will be better then the other.
The assumption that you making that physical traits and mental stabilities is based on the X chromosome is ludicrous. You're trying to relate multi-gene and multi-chromosomal traits to one chromosomal and mutilating the genetics to fail to prove your point. The amount of bad science you are trying to pull off as a legitimate argument.
Only having one X chromosome doesn't make anyone more susceptible to mutation. It makes them male and more likely to express x-linked genes. If anything it makes the male less healthy.
You're wrong. I can't say it more simply.
Bob
--
How can you feel so good,
Making jesus so ashamed of you?
|
|
